U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX371990: GSM1255518: NPRL3 DT40 rep 2 [4C-Seq]; Gallus gallus; OTHER
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 2000) run: 22.7M spots, 4.6G bases, 2.6Gb downloads

Submitted by: Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)
Study: Clustering of CpG islands constitutes an important determinant of the interphase chromosome 3D organization [4C-Seq]
show Abstracthide Abstract
Using 4C-Seq experimental procedure we have characterized, in cultured chicken lymphoid and erythroid cells, genome-wide patterns of spatial contacts of several CpG islands scattered along the chromosome 14. A clear tendency for interaction of CpG islands present within the same and different chromosomes has been observed. Accordingly, preferential spatial contacts between Sp1 binding motifs, and other GC-rich genomic elements including DNA sequence motifs capable to form G-quadruplexes were demonstrated. On the other hand, an anchor placed in gene/CpG islands-poor area was found to form spatial contacts with other gene/CpG islands-poor areas within chromosome 14 and other chromosomes. These results corroborate the two compartments model of interphase chromosome spatial organization and suggest that clustering of CpG islands harboring promoters and origins of DNA replication constitutes an important determinant of the 3D organization of eukaryotic genome in the cell nucleus. Using ChIP-Seq experimental procedure we have mapped genome-wide the CTCF deposition sites in chicken lymphoid and erythroid cells subjected to the 4C analysis. A good correlation between the density of these sites and the level of 4C signals was observed for the anchors located in CpG islands. It is thus possible that CTCF contributes to the clustering of CpG islands revealed in our experiments. Overall design: We applied 4C-seq to map long-range interactions of a CpG island harboring promoter of a housekeeping gene NPRL3 on a genome-wide scale in DT40 and HD3 cell lines in chicken (Gallus gallus). Two replicates per cell line were sequenced in paired-end mode with a depth of 45-64 million reads. We next performed additional 4C experiments on HD3 cells with different 4C anchors. In three experiments anchors were placed on different CpG island on the chromosome 14 that have demonstrated a strong interaction with the NPRL3 anchor (anchors near TSR3, TRAP1, PPL genes). In the forth experiment (anchor GENE-Des) the anchor was placed in a gene-poor area that did not interact with the NPRL3 promoter. The libraries for all anchors were pooled and sequenced in paired-end mode with a total depth of 75 million reads. Anchor NPRL3: two replicates for HD3 and two replicates for DT40 cell lines. Other anchors (TSR3, GENE-Des, TRAP1, PPL): two replicates, pooled library
Sample: NPRL3 DT40 rep 2 [4C-Seq]
SAMN02389605 • SRS497420 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Gallus gallus
Library:
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 2000
Strategy: OTHER
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: other
Layout: PAIRED
Construction protocol: PCR reactions were performed using the Expand Long Template PCR system (Roche). The 50 µl PCR reaction contained 120 ng of the DNA template, 1× PCR buffer 1, 0.3 µM of each of the primers, 0.35 mM of each of dNTPs, and 3.75 units of Hot start Taq DNA polymerase (SibEnzyme)Expand Long enzyme mix (Roche). The sequences of HindIII / DpnII 4C primers are as follows (5’-3’): TSR3 bait CACTCATCTCCCCGTACTTTG / AAGTTTCTTTTAATTTGGAGACTTTC; GENE-Des bait AATTTGTGAAGCAGTTGTATGTAGTC / TCTTCTCCACATAATCCCACACT; NPRL3 bait GCCAGGATATAGATTCTGCTTT / CCTCTGACATAATTGCCGATAG; TRAP1 bait CCAGAGATTCTCAAATCACAGCA / CTATGGGGACAAGTGAGGAACAG; PPL bait AAAGCATCTCCTCTCCCTGAAG / GTCTCCCACAGTCACTCCTCCT. PCR amplification was performed in the linear range as follows: initial denaturation for 2 min at 94°C; 30 cycles of 15 s at 94°C, 1 min at 57°C, and 3 min at 68°C; final elongation for 4 min at 68°C. PCR products were purified and concentrated using QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). After separation according to sizes in 1.5% agarose gel, two zones - 70-400 bp (S fraction) and 400-1500bp (L fraction) - were cut. After extraction with QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen), the fragments of L-fraction were sonicated to reduce the fragment size to 100-500 nucleotides using Covaris S220 with following parameters: time 300 seconds, duty cycle 10%, peak power 23W. Then S and L fraction were processed using TruSeq DNA sample prep kit v.2 (Illumina) with post-PCR size selection on agarose gel (fragments with length 200-600 nucleotides were selected). After purification library concentrations were measured using Qubit fluorimeter (Invitrogen) and real-time PCR with primers complementary to distal regions of Illumina adapters (I-qPCR-1.1: AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGAT and I-qPCR-2.1: CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGA). Then libraries from S and L fractions were combined in equal amounts, diluted to 2nM, denatured using 0.1M NaOH and diluted to final concentration 10 pM using HT1 buffer (Illumina). Cluster generation was performed using cBot instrument and TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3 reagents and sequencing - using HiSeq2000 instrument and TruSeq SBS Kit v3 reagents (Illumina) with read length 101 nucleotides from each end.
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM1255518
Links:
External link:
Runs: 1 run, 22.7M spots, 4.6G bases, 2.6Gb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR102268122,704,0214.6G2.6Gb2014-03-03

ID:
532106

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...